ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Comparative Proteomics Reveals Conserved and Lineage-Specific Molecular Toolkits in Lophotrochozoan Biomineralization.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal biomineralization has evolved repeatedly, yielding diverse skeletal structures. A key question is whether this diversity stems from molecular convergence or a shared ancestral toolkit. Studying lophotrochozoans-a group with carbonate, phosphate, iron, and mixed mineralization systems-provides an ideal framework for addressing this issue but remains underrepresented in comparative omics studies. Here, we present a genome assembly and shell matrix proteome of the phosphate-biomineralizing brachiopod Lingula anatina CN, derived from a geographically distinct population. By integrating these data with comparative proteomic analysis across seven lophotrochozoan lineages representing diverse mineralization chemistries, we provide novel insights into the molecular basis of biomineralization. Sequence-based comparisons reveal extensive lineage specificity of shell matrix proteins, with little conservation across distant taxa. In contrast, domain-level analyses uncover a broadly conserved repertoire of functional modules-including EF-hand, von Willebrand factor type A, collagen-related, chitin-binding, and ferritin-like domains-recurrently recruited into shell matrix proteins across lineages. Importantly, similarity in shell matrix protein composition correlates more strongly with mineralization chemistry than with phylogenetic distance. Specifically, phosphate-mineralizing systems share a higher proportion of conserved shell matrix proteins and domains across deep evolutionary distances than do carbonate-based systems, indicating that mineral chemistry exerts a dominant selective pressure on the evolution of biomineralization-associated proteins. Lineage-specific innovations appear to arise primarily through domain shuffling, expansion of low-complexity regions, and gene family diversification. These findings support a model wherein lophotrochozoan biomineralization is underpinned by a shared ancestral molecular toolkit, differentially filtered and elaborated according to mineral chemistry, providing new insights into the early evolution of animal skeletal systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.