Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535558›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026

Protein Structure Characters in the Light of Phylogenetic Systematics.

Nicholas J Matzke, Changhao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas J MatzkeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-7656
Changhao LiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0000-8676-472X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure characters have great potential for improving phylogenetic inference, especially for deep nodes where amino acid sequences are highly diverged. The combination of AlphaFold structure predictions and Foldseek's "3Di" structural alphabet makes it relatively easy to conduct model-based phylogenetic inference that includes a partition of slow-evolving 3Di characters. However, we show that even identical amino acid sequences can produce substantially different 3Di characters, depending on the source of the structural model and whether inter-chain interactions are considered. We argue that such variability can be addressed with key concepts from traditional organism-based phylogenetic systematics: semaphoront, hypodigm, and character ascertainment method. To illustrate this, we develop an analogy between organismal development, taphonomy, and subsequent description and character coding by a systematist, and the process of protein synthesis, folding, and interaction and subsequent extraction, experimentation, and structural modeling by a biochemist. We conclude that differences in 3Di characters between semaphoronts are not intrinsically a problem, but they do require that the researcher uses the same replicable method on all proteins in the phylogenetic analysis. The guiding principle should be to maximize the chance that character differences in the data matrix are the results of underlying evolutionary changes, rather than artifacts due to differences in the methods used for obtaining semaphoronts and coding characters.

Indexed as

PhylogenyProteinsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsEvolution, MolecularModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsalphaFoldfoldseekphylogenetic systematicsprotein structuresemaphorontsstructural phylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID42535558
PMCPMC13455011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.