ReviewJournal of separation science2026
Are Microextraction Techniques Truly Green? A Critical Assessment of Green Sample Preparation Practices.
Review in Journal of separation science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are Microextraction Techniques Truly Green? A Critical Assessment of Green Sample Preparation Practices.Journal of separation science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of sample preparation methods has led to smaller versions of traditional solid- and liquid-based techniques. This trend aims to align these methods with green analytical chemistry principles by reducing sample and solvent use and enabling more flexible designs, including online and automated systems. However, although miniaturization is often linked to environmental benefits, it also presents significant issues that are sometimes overlooked. These include the continued use of toxic solvents, labor-intensive procedures, and potential health and environmental risks that may be underestimated in the pursuit of "green" solutions. Therefore, this review offers a comprehensive and current overview of both solid- and liquid-based miniaturized techniques, emphasizing their environmental challenges. It focuses on balancing analytical performance with core green chemistry principles. Selected examples from recent literature highlight current applications and trends. Additionally, we discuss emerging directions and ongoing challenges that must be addressed to truly achieve sustainable, green implementation of these methods. We hope this review encourages a more critical perspective among readers and promotes the development of genuinely greener sample preparation strategies across different analytical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.