ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Quantitative evaluation of respiratory motion-induced blurring in expiratory-phase CBCT for pancreatic SBRT.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in image-guided radiotherapy because it reflects the patient's anatomy immediately before treatment. However, CBCT images of the abdominal organs, including the pancreas, are often degraded by respiratory motion. PURPOSE: To address this limitation, this study quantitatively evaluated expiratory-phase CBCT (EP-CBCT), an acquisition method designed to reduce respiratory motion-induced blurring during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 10 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing SBRT at our institution. Daily CT and EP-CBCT scans were acquired on each treatment day. EP-CBCT images were obtained with repeated end-exhalation breath-holds to collect projection data during the expiratory phase. Because of feasibility limitations in routine clinical practice, a direct intra-patient comparison with conventional free-breathing CBCT was not performed. Image quality was evaluated using edge response width (ERW), structural similarity index (SSIM), and a blinded subjective assessment based on mean opinion scores (MOS). A supplementary retrospective comparison with a historical four-dimensional CBCT (4D-CBCT) dataset was also performed.
resultsDifferences in ERW between daily CT and EP-CBCT (ΔERW) were evaluated using equivalence testing with a predefined equivalence margin of ± 1 mm. The mean ERW (98% confidence interval) was 2.04 mm (1.95-2.13) for EP-CBCT and 1.73 mm (1.66-1.79) for daily CT. The mean ΔERW was -0.31 mm (-0.40 to -0.23 mm). Equivalence testing demonstrated that EP-CBCT was statistically equivalent to daily CT (p < 0.01). The mean SSIM value was 0.83, indicating high structural similarity between EP-CBCT and daily CT. Subjective image quality assessment showed significantly higher scores for daily CT than for EP-CBCT, whereas EP-CBCT consistently outperformed historical 4D-CBCT, with good interobserver agreement.
conclusionThese findings suggest that EP-CBCT can reduce respiratory motion-induced blurring to a degree comparable to that of daily CT, supporting its potential utility for anatomical assessment immediately before irradiation in patients undergoing pancreatic SBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.