Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535478›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Reference-Free large language model agents for physician-guided radiotherapy treatment planning.

Dongrong Yang, Xin Wu, Yibo Xie, Xinyi Li, Qiuwen Wu, Q Jackie Wu, Yang Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongrong YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Xin WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Yibo XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Xinyi LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Qiuwen WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Q Jackie WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.
Yang ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, US.

Funding

AAPM/RSNAVarian Master Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities, offering the potential to streamline workflows and enhance efficiency across diverse tasks. However, their application in domain-specific areas, such as radiotherapy treatment planning, remains challenging due to the lack of publicly available, specialized knowledge required for these tasks. PURPOSE: To investigate the critical architectural and functional components necessary to adapt an off-the-shelf large language model into a clinically viable planning agent for inverse treatment planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS/

methodsTwenty head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients who received IMRT at our institution were retrospectively collected under IRB approval. The LLM agent was implemented to directly interact with the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) to iteratively extract intermediate plan states and propose new constraint values to guide inverse optimization. Its decision-making was informed by real-time plan evaluations and prior optimization outcomes, enabling adaptive refinement of planning strategies across iterations. The agent was equipped with three core capabilities: comprehension of clinical planning objectives, contextual understanding of the optimization environment, and arithmetic proficiency for quantitative reasoning. Treatment planning was conducted in a reference-free inference setting, wherein the LLM operated without prior exposure to manually generated treatment plans and without any fine-tuning or task-specific training. LLM-generated treatment plans were compared with clinically approved plans created by certified dosimetrists. Key dosimetric endpoints were evaluated and statistically analyzed. Paired comparisons between LLM-generated and clinical plans were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

resultsLLM-generated plans achieved comparable organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing relative to clinical plans, while demonstrating improved hot spot control (D

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of a reference-free, LLM-driven workflow for automated IMRT treatment planning in a commercial TPS. The proposed approach provides a generalizable solution that could reduce planning variability and support broader adoption of AI-based planning strategies.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsLarge Language ModelsPhysiciansRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedagentslarge language modelradiation therapy treatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42535478
PMCPMC13425704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.