ArticleMedical physics2026
Reference-Free large language model agents for physician-guided radiotherapy treatment planning.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autonomous radiotherapy planning via agentic orchestration using a multimodal TPS-integrated compound AI platform.Machine learning. Health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLarge language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities, offering the potential to streamline workflows and enhance efficiency across diverse tasks. However, their application in domain-specific areas, such as radiotherapy treatment planning, remains challenging due to the lack of publicly available, specialized knowledge required for these tasks. PURPOSE: To investigate the critical architectural and functional components necessary to adapt an off-the-shelf large language model into a clinically viable planning agent for inverse treatment planning in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS/
methodsTwenty head-and-neck (HN) cancer patients who received IMRT at our institution were retrospectively collected under IRB approval. The LLM agent was implemented to directly interact with the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) to iteratively extract intermediate plan states and propose new constraint values to guide inverse optimization. Its decision-making was informed by real-time plan evaluations and prior optimization outcomes, enabling adaptive refinement of planning strategies across iterations. The agent was equipped with three core capabilities: comprehension of clinical planning objectives, contextual understanding of the optimization environment, and arithmetic proficiency for quantitative reasoning. Treatment planning was conducted in a reference-free inference setting, wherein the LLM operated without prior exposure to manually generated treatment plans and without any fine-tuning or task-specific training. LLM-generated treatment plans were compared with clinically approved plans created by certified dosimetrists. Key dosimetric endpoints were evaluated and statistically analyzed. Paired comparisons between LLM-generated and clinical plans were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsLLM-generated plans achieved comparable organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing relative to clinical plans, while demonstrating improved hot spot control (D
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of a reference-free, LLM-driven workflow for automated IMRT treatment planning in a commercial TPS. The proposed approach provides a generalizable solution that could reduce planning variability and support broader adoption of AI-based planning strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.