ArticleEndocrine connections2026
Evaluation of desmopressin stimulation test specificity in healthy volunteers.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06635629 (Phase II Prospective Evaluation of Desmopressin Stimulation Test Performance in ACTH-dependent Cushing s Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Prospective Evaluation of Desmopressin Stimulation Test Performance in ACTH-dependent Cushing s Syndrome
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe desmopressin stimulation test (DesST) is used to identify Cushing disease (CD). Reportedly, most healthy people and patients with non-neoplastic hypercortisolism lack a significant response. We aimed to evaluate and improve DesST specificity (Sp).
designProspective evaluation of four DesST protocols in healthy volunteers.
methodsTwenty healthy volunteers underwent four DesST protocols in a randomized order. Protocols involved fluid restriction with desmopressin 10 µg (10NPO; 'standard'), 4 µg (4NPO), and 10 µg preceded by dexamethasone 1 mg (10+DexNPO); and desmopressin 10 µg without fluid restriction (10H2O). We evaluated Sp for each protocol, using established response criteria.
resultsPrevious criteria of relative increases of 35% and/or 20% for ACTH and cortisol, respectively, had low Sp: 50% (95% CI: 28-72%; 10NPO) to 85% (95% CI: 69-100%; 10+DexNPO). Using absolute ACTH increase >8.1 pmol/L (37 pg/mL) improved Sp to 100% across all protocols. Compared with 10NPO, median ACTH and cortisol were lower throughout during 10+DexNPO and also at +15 min during 4NPO (ACTH: 4.4 vs 4.9 pmol/L (19.9 vs 22.1 pg/mL), P = 0.06; cortisol: 248 vs 284 nmol/L (9.0 vs 10.3 µg/dL), P = 0.01). 10H2O and 10NPO results were similar. Adverse events were mild; hyponatremia occurred after 5/80 tests.
conclusionAfter desmopressin, healthy volunteers have small absolute increases in ACTH and cortisol that equate to large relative changes from baseline. Optimized response criteria should likely incorporate absolute values. Fluid restriction did not impact Sp, but using a lower desmopressin dose and dexamethasone pre-treatment are promising ways to improve diagnostic accuracy, if sensitivity is maintained in CD. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Half of healthy volunteers had a response consistent with Cushing disease (CD) during a commonly used 10 µg desmopressin stimulation test, interpreted using relative ACTH and/or cortisol increases. This puts the test's reliability for excluding CD in question, particularly in settings of mild hypercortisolism. These situations include differentiating CD from non-neoplastic hypercortisolism, identifying cyclic ectopic ACTH-producing tumors during nadir phases, and establishing early CD recurrence. Optimized response criteria likely require absolute ACTH and/or cortisol cutoffs. Using a reduced 4 µg dose of desmopressin or pre-treatment with 1 mg dexamethasone improved test specificity, offering promising ways to improve test performance if sensitivity is maintained in CD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06635629.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.