SynthesisJournal of global health2026
Olfactory dysfunction and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Olfactory dysfunction is a highly prevalent sensory deficit in older adults and a recognised early indicator of biological ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Emerging epidemiological evidence links olfactory impairment to an elevated risk of all-cause mortality, yet methodological variations in how olfactory dysfunction is defined and assessed across studies have led to inconsistent effect estimates, necessitating a systematic, quantitative synthesis of the evidence. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library for cohort studies published up to 1 July 2025 that investigated the association between olfactory dysfunction and mortality in older adults. We used a multilevel meta-analytic model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We identified 14 eligible cohort studies (12 included in meta-analysis). Olfactory dysfunction was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, with a pooled HR of 1.20 (95% CI = 1.11, 1.29, P < 0.001). Publication bias was detected (Egger's test, P = 0.0003), and Trim-and-Fill correction attenuated the pooled HR to 1.09 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.19), with the association remaining statistically significant. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the primary finding, with no single study driving the association. Conclusions: Olfactory dysfunction is associated with all-cause mortality risk in older adults, with the strength of this association strongly influenced by methodological choices in the definition and assessment of olfactory function. These findings highlight olfactory dysfunction as a potential surrogate marker of systemic physiological decline in ageing populations and underscore the critical need for standardised olfactory assessment methodologies in future epidemiological and geriatric research to improve the comparability and clinical translation of evidence. Registration: PROSPERO: CRD420251173699.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.