Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535284›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2026

The use of cannabis for medical reasons in the UK: Prescriptions, sources, products, and high-risk use.

Elle Wadsworth, David Hammond, Tom P Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elle WadsworthCentre for Drug Use Research, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-8493
David HammondSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Tom P FreemanCentre for Drug Use Research, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5667-507X

Funding

CIHR PJT-153342Society for the Study of AddictionUK Research and Innovation MR/Y017560/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe United Kingdom legalized medical cannabis in 2018, yet little is known about people using cannabis medically with and without a prescription. This study aimed to estimate: 1) the percentage of people reporting using cannabis medically with and without a prescription; 2) the sources; 3) products used; and 4) associations between frequent product use and medical cannabis status.

methodsData were from national repeat cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2023 and 2024. UK participants were aged 16-65 who used cannabis in the past 12 months (

resultsOverall, 12.9% of respondents reported receiving a medical cannabis prescription, 35.9% reported medical use without a prescription, and 51.2% reported no medical use. Cannabis was sourced through diverse routes; only 10.9% of people with prescriptions obtained all their cannabis from a prescription. Respondents with a prescription had a higher probability of reporting frequent use of drops, capsules, vape oils, edibles, drinks, solid concentrates, hash/kief, and topicals (aRRs = range between 1.82 and 3.51)) and a higher probability of screening positive for high-risk use (aRR = 3.09; 2.51-3.79) than respondents who did not use medically.

conclusionsPeople with medical cannabis prescriptions show a higher probability of frequent use of processed products and of meeting a threshold for high-risk use. Healthcare encounters during medical cannabis prescribing should discuss risks related to products, potency, and adverse effects such as cannabis use disorder.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsMedical MarijuanaAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited KingdomYoung AdultMedical Marijuanaaccesscannabiscannabis sourcesCUDITmedical cannabispotency

Identifiers

PMID42535284
PMCPMC13439256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.