ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026
Functional Differences in Muscle Architecture Across the Pelvis and Hind Limb of Primates.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUnderstanding the architectural diversity of primate musculature is essential for interpreting locomotor function and reconstructing evolutionary adaptations. This study examines whether interspecific differences in pelvic and hind limb muscle architecture reflect functional differentiation among major muscle groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present detailed dissection data from six primate species, alongside a large sample of additional specimens collected from previous studies. We quantify fascicle length, pennation angle, muscle mass, and physiological cross-sectional area across the hind limb and pelvis in each species. We assessed whether differences in muscle architecture were consistent across functional groups and taxa. Differences in muscle architecture were analyzed across functional groups, muscles, and species, with architectural specialization interpreted in functional terms, e.g., reflecting relative emphasis on force, power, displacement, or generalist/stabilizing roles.
resultsOur results reveal conserved configurations in load-bearing muscles, but marked divergence in others, particularly in knee and hip musculature. Notably, muscle specialization was more conserved between species with similarity in their ecology/locomotor mode than between those who are closely related, indicating that muscle architecture is closely linked to habitual hind limb function. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that patterns of pelvic and hind limb muscle specialization across primates are driven primarily by ecological and locomotor function, rather than evolutionary relatedness. The dataset provides a detailed, anatomically grounded resource for future comparative and biomechanical studies of primate hind limb function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.