Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42535258›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2026

Evolution of self-reactive B cells: lessons from a lupus model.

Kristine Oleinika, Michael C Carroll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristine OleinikaProgram in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-2938
Michael C CarrollProgram in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-4295

Funding

Evolution of autoreactive GC and epitope spreading in lupusR01AR074105 · NIAMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Michael Craig Carroll · 2018 to 2026
$4.2M
Lupus Research Alliance (LRA) N/ANIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074105U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) HT9425-24-1-0598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus develops when autoreactive B cells escape tolerance and enter differentiation pathways that sustain pathogenic autoantibody responses. A defining feature of lupus is the evolving autoantibody repertoire, in which initially focused autoreactivity broadens over time through recruitment of additional self-reactive B cell clones as well as continued mutation and selection of B cells engaged in the response. Here, we review insights from the 564Igi lupus model, in which a defined autoreactive B cell clone creates an autoimmune environment that permits a previously tolerant polyclonal wild-type (WT) B cell repertoire to enter the response. Studies using mixed bone marrow chimera and adoptive transfer approaches show that WT-derived B cells can be recruited into established autoreactive niches, participate in germinal center and extrafollicular pathways, and contribute to epitope-spread autoantibody responses. We discuss how studies in the present model have reframed epitope spreading as a dynamic process of self-reactive B cell evolution, in which otherwise restrained B cells are incorporated into an ongoing autoimmune response and shaped by the niches that support their activation, differentiation, persistence, and diversification.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAnimalsAutoantibodiesAutoimmunityDisease Models, AnimalHumansAutoantibodiesB cellsepitope spreadingself-reactivesystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID42535258
PMCPMC13429514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.