ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Infratentorial Hemorrhages: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Technical Outcomes.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous infratentorial hemorrhages (SIHs) are a type of hemorrhagic stroke that compromise the cerebellum and/or brainstem. While minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches are effective in treating spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage, their efficacy in managing SIH remains unclear. This uncertainty prompted the undertaking of this systematic review and meta-analysis. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they had a minimum of five patients and reported at least one outcome of interest. The outcomes evaluated were technical success, mean hematoma reduction, good functional outcomes at 3- and 6-month follow-up, complication rates, rebleeding rates, and postoperative mortality. A subgroup analysis was performed based on hemorrhage location and surgical approach. Depending on the data, either a random-effects or common-effects model was applied, and heterogeneity was assessed using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.