ReviewAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Villaret Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Villaret syndrome (VS) is a rare condition characterized by concurrent involvement of cranial nerves (CNs) IX-XII and the cervical sympathetic chain, suggesting a pathological process in the retrostyloid compartment. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize current knowledge regarding etiologies, clinical presentation, management strategies, and CN outcomes. A systematic search was performed across the PubMed and Scopus databases up to January 2025, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included all case reports and case series describing patients with clinically and/or radiologically confirmed VS. Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted regarding demographics, etiology, onset modality, imaging findings, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes. Among the 13 identified patients (mean age 48.7 years), neoplastic causes were most common (58.3%), followed by vascular (25%) and infectious/inflammatory etiologies (16.7%). The most frequent mode of onset was subacute (58.3%), and MRI was the preferred imaging modality in all cases. Conservative management (including steroids or antithrombotic therapy) was used in 41.6% of cases, while 33.3% underwent surgery. Complete or near-complete recovery was observed in 50% of patients, predominantly those with vascular or inflammatory etiologies. Neoplastic VS was associated with poorer outcomes. VS, although rare, should be recognized early and should prompt the clinician to use modern imaging modalities to search for a pathological process in the retrostyloid compartment. Given its rarity and complexity in most cases, the treatment strategy should be tailored to each specific patient and involve a multidisciplinary team of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.