ArticleCase reports in neurology
Successful Recovery from Life-Threatening Ventilatory Failure with Efgartigimod in Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: Two Case Reports.
Article in Case reports in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Japan, efgartigimod is approved for treating generalized myasthenia gravis in patients who are anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive, anti-muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive, or seronegative. Efgartigimod efficacy has been reported in seropositive patients with myasthenic crisis; however, evidence in seronegative patients with myasthenic crisis remains limited. We report 2 patients with seronegative generalized myasthenia gravis presenting with myasthenic crisis as the initial manifestation, successfully treated with efgartigimod. Case Presentation: Case 1 involved an 83-year-old man admitted with acute dyspnea requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure initially attributed to acute exacerbation of heart failure with pleural effusion. Due to poor respiratory recovery, he was referred to neurology on hospital day 14. Clinical features including ventilatory impairment and fatigable limb weakness, together with electrophysiological findings, supported myasthenia gravis diagnosis. Following oral immunosuppressants and intravenous efgartigimod, he was weaned from mechanical ventilation on hospital day 42. Case 2 involved a 75-year-old man with progressive dyspnea and signs of right heart failure requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. He was referred to neurology on hospital day 2. Electrophysiological testing under sedation suggested myasthenia gravis. After methylprednisolone pulse therapy, subcutaneous efgartigimod was initiated, achieving ventilator liberation on hospital day 40. Conclusion: Efgartigimod was effective in treating myasthenic crisis requiring mechanical ventilation in seronegative generalized myasthenia gravis, regardless of autoantibody status. These cases suggest efgartigimod may serve as an alternative or adjunctive therapeutic option for severe myasthenia gravis exacerbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.