ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery2026
Midterm Results on Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device (MR-PVED): First Reported Experience in Asia.
Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy in consecutive patients treated with Pipeline Vantage flow diverter in an Asian population before the partial recall, as well as their outcomes in both unruptured and ruptured cohorts. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single center. Consecutive patients treated with Pipeline Vantage for intracranial aneurysms between August 2022 and July 2024, regardless of their rupture status, were systematically reviewed. There was no aneurysm size or location exclusion criteria. New adverse neurological events noted during hospitalization or the follow-up period were recorded as clinical safety outcomes. Radiological performance, including the degree of aneurysm occlusion, in-stent stenosis (ISS) and their braid deformation patterns were analyzed. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed based on the intention-to-treat population. Categorical variables were presented as numbers with percentages, and continuous variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: A total of 31 patients with 36 aneurysms were identified. The average maximum aneurysm dimension was 5.7 mm. Four cases (12.9%) were presented as acute aneurysm rupture. Adjunctive coiling of the aneurysm was performed in eight cases (26%). At a mean of 12.4 months, the morbidity rate was 6.5%, and no mortality was observed. All the new adverse neurological events belonged to ischemic complications. Adequate aneurysm occlusion was achieved at 77.8%. ISS was observed in four cases (12.9%) while the rate of braid changes was noted to be 6.5%. Conclusion: This is the first-ever study reporting the performance of Pipeline Vantage in Asia. The occlusion rate and safety outcomes were similar to those in recent studies. However, the relatively high incidence of ISS or braid deformation remains a concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.