ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Antimicrobial-impregnated Sutures Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Antimicrobial-impregnated Sutures Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a common complication in plastic surgery, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged recovery, and increased healthcare costs. Antimicrobial-impregnated sutures (AISs) have shown promise in reducing SSI rates across surgical disciplines. However, their efficacy in plastic surgery remains unclear. Methods: This review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) 2020 guidelines. PubMed and Web of Science were searched for comparative studies assessing AIS use. Seven studies were identified. Data extracted included patient demographics, study variables, and postoperative outcomes. SSI rates were pooled using a random-effects model and reported as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses of wound healing/outcomes were performed using Fisher exact tests. Results: In a pool of 1553 patients (807 intervention, 746 control), AIS use was associated with a significant reduction in SSIs (RR 0.68, 95% CI [0.51-0.90], Conclusions: AISs are associated with improved postoperative outcomes, particularly in reducing incidence of SSIs and improving cosmetic outcomes. Although these findings support the use of AISs in plastic surgery procedures, randomized controlled trials comparing antimicrobial agents and their use in different anatomical areas are warranted to establish definitive clinical guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.