ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Wait Time for Pediatric Gastrointestinal Procedures.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Delays in care can lead to poor health outcomes and suboptimal patient and family experiences. We aimed to reduce the average wait time for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (procedure request to procedure completion) from 145 to 15 days (a 90% reduction) within 4 months (November 2023 to March 2024). Methods: A3 problem-solving methodology was used. The primary intervention was a multiday, multidisciplinary improvement workshop. Outcome measures included (1) procedure request date to procedure completion date, and (2) favorable patient satisfaction score for timeliness of access to care. Process measures included (1) procedure request date to date procedure scheduled by staff, and (2) date procedure scheduled by staff to procedure completion date. The balancing measure was the number of procedures scheduled per weekday. Control charts assessed the impact of interventions. Results: Following the primary intervention (October 2023), special cause improvement was seen for all but the balancing measure. Outcome measure 1 achieved a sustained reduction in mean monthly wait time from 145 to 26.4 days (an 82% reduction), whereas outcome measure 2 achieved sustained improvement in patient satisfaction from 39.7% to 50.2% (a 26.4% relative improvement). Process measures 1 and 2 had sustained reductions from 56.5 to 14.7 days (a 74% reduction) and 89.1 to 20.7 days (a 77% reduction), respectively. The balancing measure also remained unchanged at a monthly average of 11.7 procedures scheduled per weekday. Conclusions: Using A3 problem-solving methodology, we achieved an 82% sustained reduction in endoscopic procedure wait times with a concurrent 26.4% improvement in patient satisfaction. Procedures are now routinely completed within 1 month of the request date.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.