ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Implementing a federated regional diabetes register in a decentralized health system: implications for healthcare organization and the European Health Data Space.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fragmentation of health information systems remains a major barrier to effective health system performance across Europe, particularly in decentralized settings. Federated data infrastructures have been proposed as a scalable solution, but evidence on their implementation at population level remains limited. Objectives: We aimed to describe the implementation of a federated information infrastructure at regional level and assess the completeness and variability of linked data across participating centers, discussing implications of scaling up the approach within the European Health Data Space. Materials and methods: We carried out a population-based cohort study linking administrative, clinical, and patient-reported data across three healthcare organizations in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, covering over 2.1 million residents. Data were analyzed using a federated architecture without sharing individual-level information. Baseline characteristics were assessed at 1 January 2019, with longitudinal follow-up over 6 years. Results: We identified 116,552 individuals with diabetes (prevalence 5.6%). Among individuals with available classification, 90.8% had type 2 diabetes. Clinical data were available for 43.5% of patients in charge of diabetes clinics, with substantial heterogeneity across centers (12.8-80.6%). Among those with clinical data, 27.5% had baseline HbA1c levels below 48 mmol/mol, while 69% had elevated systolic pressure (≥130 mmHg) and 56.6% had high diastolic pressure (≥80 mmHg). Sociodemographic variables were largely missing. Patient-reported outcomes were collected in 521 individuals, demonstrating feasibility but limited scalability. Discussion: Federated linkage of administrative, clinical, and patient-reported data is feasible at regional scale and enables population-level monitoring of diabetes care. However, variability in data completeness was primarily driven by organizational and governance factors rather than technical capacity. These findings provide empirical evidence that strengthening health data systems requires alignment of healthcare organization and service delivery models, beyond technical solutions alone. Conclusion: The REWINDER project built a collaborative information infrastructure using federated linkage of different data sources and person-reported outcomes, independently managed by local healthcare organizations. The project has made available a large database to inform policy and planning of diabetes care across the region. The system may be used as a model that can be conveniently scaled up to other geographical areas and chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.