SynthesisFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Neonatal pain assessment and non-pharmacological analgesia: an integrative literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal procedural and prolonged pain remains a frequent and clinically important problem in neonatal care, particularly among preterm and critically ill infants who undergo repeated invasive procedures. Objective: To synthesize evidence on neonatal pain assessment tools and non-pharmacological analgesic strategies, with attention to clinical implementation and emerging objective or digital assessment approaches. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed English-language articles published from January 2000 to May 2025. Eligible studies included primary research, high-quality secondary evidence, and clinically relevant methodological or technological studies involving preterm or term neonates, defined as infants with a birth age of ≤28 days, or infants cared for in neonatal intensive care units. Studies were included if they addressed the development, validation, or clinical application of neonatal pain assessment tools, or the efficacy, safety, or implementation of non-pharmacological analgesic interventions. Studies limited to pharmacological analgesia, older children, or adults were excluded. Results: Thirty-five studies were included. The evidence supports the use of validated multidimensional assessment tools for structured evaluation of neonatal pain. It indicates that family-integrated, sensory, and behavioral non-pharmacological approaches can reduce procedural pain responses. However, the strength and consistency of evidence are greater for single procedures than for repeated or prolonged pain. Artificial intelligence-based facial expression analysis, physiological monitoring, and biomarker-based approaches show potential for more objective pain detection but remain insufficiently validated for routine bedside decision-making. Conclusion: Standardized neonatal pain management should combine validated assessment scales, protocolized first-line non-pharmacological care, staff training, and parent involvement. Future research should prioritize repeated and prolonged pain, high-risk neonatal populations, implementation in routine neonatal intensive care practice, and the prospective validation of digital assessment systems in real-world clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.