ArticleJournal of family & community medicine
Association between research exposure and medical specialization choices among medical students and trainees in Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study.
Article in Journal of family & community medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch exposure may shape specialty choice, but how its timing, duration, and perceived importance connect to career decisions is not well understood, particularly in Saudi Arabia. This study examined that link between medical students, interns, and junior residents in Saudi Arabia and the perceived high research impact on career decisions and identified factors affecting their prediction. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional survey conducted in Saudi Arabia in 2025, recruited 286 participants through convenience and snowball sampling. The questionnaire covered demographics, research experience, publication output, mentorship quality, and specialty preferences. The main outcome was whether research had high or low impact on career decisions. Association between the level of impact of research exposure on medical specialization choices and participants' sociodemographic and research-related characteristics was examined using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables.
resultsOf 286 participants, 55.2% were female, 47.6% were interns, and 26.2% rated research as highly influential in their choice of specialty. General surgery was the most preferred specialty (16.4%), followed by family medicine (7.7%) then pediatrics, ophthalmology, neurology, and other specialties (each 6.3%). The top influencing factors were research experience, mentor influence, and financial prospects. Male gender, longer research duration (≥6 months), and meaningful research experience correlated with greater impact in bivariate analysis (
conclusionOne in four trainees saw research as a genuine driver of specialty choice, with meaningful research experience and research involvement of more than 6 months as the only independent predictors. Embedding structured research and mentorship into the curriculum rather than leaving it to extracurricular chance may better support career decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.