ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Visual attention and subjective preference in mascot design: evidence from eye-tracking, ratings, and fsQCA.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mascot design plays an important role in brand communication, yet empirical evidence on how specific visual features shape attention and preference remains limited. This study examined how mascot type, head-to-body ratio, and eye size are associated with fixation-based visual attention and self-reported preference among young adults. Methods: The study followed a three-stage design. First, Experiments 1-3 used eye-tracking to examine visual-attention patterns related to mascot type, head-to-body ratio, and eye size. Second, a questionnaire-based preference rating study examined whether these attention patterns converged with self-reported liking. Third, Experiment 4 adopted a full-factorial stimulus structure, and fsQCA was used to identify configurational pathways associated with high total fixation duration. Results: Animal mascots, the 1:2 head-to-body ratio, and large-eye conditions showed the strongest descriptive attention and preference patterns within their respective design variables. The fsQCA results identified multiple sufficient configurations associated with high total fixation duration. A compact head-to-body ratio condition, operationalized as 1:1.5 or 1:2, appeared as a shared core condition across the sufficient pathways, although it did not meet the threshold for a necessary condition. Discussion: These findings support a configurational understanding of mascot design, suggesting that visual attention and preference are shaped by both individual design features and their combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.