Trial reportFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Bairui granules versus Reyanning granules in adults with acute bronchitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, comparative trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bairui granules, a monotherapy derived from Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Bairui granules in patients with acute bronchitis (Wind-heat invading lung syndrome). Study Design: The study (ChiCTR2200063906) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, comparative trial. Methods: Eligible participants from seven hospitals were randomized 2:1 to receive either Bairui granules plus placebo matching Reyanning Granules (experimental group) or Reyanning granules plus placebo matching Bairui Granules (control group) orally for 7 days. The primary endpoint was cough resolution rate after treatment. Secondary endpoints included time to cough and sputum resolution, area under the curve (AUC) for cough and sputum severity, bronchitis severity score (BSS), and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) symptom scores. Results: Of 162 randomized patients, 161 completed the trial (107 experimental, 54 control). The cough resolution rate was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (72.22% vs. 35.19%; Conclusion: Bairui granules resulted in a higher cough-resolution rate and faster cough resolution than Reyanning granules in adults with acute bronchitis. The treatment was well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowproject.html?id=193073&v=1.0, identifier ChiCTR2200063906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.