ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
MMCRAG-Resp: a multi-modal corrective retrieval-augmented generation framework for explainable respiratory disease reasoning.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems only use semantic similarity to retrieve information, and since this method is quite limiting, it may find clinically irrelevant evidence and produce outputs that are unsafe or hallucinated. This drawback is particularly important in respiratory care, where the diagnosis relies heavily on very accurate physiological indicators such as spirometry patterns and symptom profiles. Methods: We propose MMCRAG-Resp., a clinically grounded, physiology-aware corrective RAG framework for respiratory intelligence. The system harmonizes 17,516 patient records from three heterogeneous public datasets (Respiratory Sound Database, NHANES spirometry, and clinical guidelines) through a unified respiratory ontology. Multi-modal embeddings (acoustic, spirometric, and textual) are fused into 144-dimensional vectors and indexed in FAISS. A novel Respiratory Relevance Score (RRS) combining spirometric pattern agreement (weight 0.45), symptom overlap (0.30), and embedding similarity (0.25) gates evidence quality before LLM consumption via a three-path correction policy. A locally deployed small language model (Ollama; llama3.2, Mistral-7B-Instruct) generates evidence-constrained, fully traceable clinical explanations without GPU requirements. Results: Evaluated on 200 held-out test queries drawn from the harmonized corpus, MMCRAG-Resp achieved a Clinical Precision@10 of 0.81, a Hallucination Rate of 0.11 (71% relative reduction over Vanilla RAG), a Spirometry Alignment Score of 0.79, and an Evidence Citation Rate of 0.87. Ablation studies confirmed that spirometry-first scoring contributes the largest single-component gain. All pairwise comparisons with baselines were statistically significant ( Conclusion: MMCRAG-Resp is, to the best of our knowledge, the first system combining multi-modal respiratory evidence retrieval, physiologically-grounded corrective RAG, and privacy-preserving local LLM inference in a single deployable clinical reasoning framework. The approach advances safe, explainable AI-assisted respiratory decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.