ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Identifying volunteer groups based on motivational patterns using latent class analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Volunteers dedicate their time and effort to enhancing communities, supporting social causes, and fostering social cohesion. Self-Determination Theory suggests that volunteer motivation may vary along a continuum of internalization from controlled to autonomous motivation. However, there is limited understanding of whether motivational profiles reflect qualitatively distinct types or primarily differ in intensity. This study seeks to identify fundamental motivational groupings among volunteers and to analyse the sociodemographic factors associated with these profiles using data from a cross-national survey. Methods: Data from 2,605 respondents in the World Values Survey (1982-2022) were analysed using 14 indicators of volunteer motivation. Two to six classes were fitted using Latent Class Analysis (LCA). Multinomial logistic regression subsequently examined associations between class membership and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A three-class model was identified, characterized primarily by varying degrees of motivational intensity: low (31.2%), moderate (32.1%), and high (36.7%) motivation. Classes showed parallel response patterns across altruistic, moral, social, religious, and self-oriented motivations, suggesting quantitative rather than qualitative differences. Older adults (35-54 years: OR = 0.62; 55 + years: OR = 0.59) and women (OR = 0.67) were less likely to belong to the low-motivation group, while higher education (OR = 1.44) was associated with greater likelihood of low motivation. Conclusion: Volunteer motivations differ primarily in intensity rather than type, suggesting a continuum of motivational engagement rather than distinct volunteer profiles. Volunteer policies should acknowledge individual differences in motivational strength and provide opportunities designed to foster deeper and more sustained engagement. Considering sociodemographic and cultural differences can help ensure volunteering initiatives are inclusive, sustainable, and effective across diverse global settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.