ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Political participation enhances subjective well-being in rural China: the dual mediating pathways of fairness and trust.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subjective well-being is a core indicator of livelihood quality and grassroots governance effectiveness. Against the backdrop of China's Rural Revitalization Strategy, improving rural residents' well-being is a central goal of national governance. However, existing scholarship has long focused on material determinants such as income and education, while lacking systematic analysis of the well-being transmission mechanisms of non-economic institutional factors like political participation. In particular, how grassroots political participation affects rural residents' happiness through socio-cognitive pathways, and the heterogeneous boundary effects of subjective social status (SSS), remain critical research gaps in rural well-being studies. Methods: Drawing on Equity Theory and Social Cognitive Theory, this study constructs a moderated parallel mediation framework based on nationally representative data from the 2023 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS). We employ OLS regression with robust standard errors, instrumental variable estimation, and bias-corrected Bootstrap testing to systematically examine the mechanisms and boundary conditions of village committee election participation on rural residents' subjective well-being. Results: First, political participation exhibits a stable positive association with rural residents' subjective well-being, which remains consistent across multiple robustness checks. However, instrumental variable estimation does not support definitive causal inference, so we prudently frame our core finding as a robust correlational association. Second, the association is transmitted through two parallel pathways: social fairness perception acts as the dominant mediating mechanism, while general social trust plays a secondary complementary role. Third, SSS exerts an asymmetric moderating effect: it only significantly strengthens the well-being returns of fairness perception among individuals with lower SSS, while no significant moderating effect is observed for the social trust pathway. Fourth, heterogeneity analysis shows that the well-being association is only significant among middle-aged (45-60 years) and high-income rural residents. Conclusion: This study delineates the dual psychological mechanisms and asymmetric stratification boundary of political participation's well-being effects in rural China. It not only fills the academic gap of existing well-being research's long-standing focus on material factors and neglect of non-economic psychological mechanisms, but also verifies the central role of institutional fairness perceptions in the well-being effects of grassroots governance. Our findings provide empirical evidence for advancing inclusive rural governance and precisely improving the sense of gain among different groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.