ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Workplace ostracism in nursing: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Workplace ostracism is a negative workplace experience. It can affect nurses' psychological wellbeing and work-related behaviors. However, this issue has not been fully discussed in nursing, a profession characterized by intensive interpersonal interaction and complex social contexts. Objective: This scoping review aimed to examine studies on workplace ostracism in nursing. It summarized the current research status, variable roles, potential mechanisms, and major outcomes. Methods: This study followed the scoping review guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE Ultimate were searched. The search covered the period from database inception to April 19, 2026. Two Reviewers independently screened the studies, reviewed the full texts, and extracted the data. Results: A total of 21 studies from nine countries were included. Most studies were conducted in China, Egypt, and Pakistan, indicating a degree of geographical concentration in the current evidence base. The included studies were predominantly cross-sectional quantitative surveys, with only a small number using time-lagged designs, multilevel nested analyses, or qualitative interviews, suggesting limited methodological diversity. In the field of nursing, workplace exclusion is mainly studied as an independent variable, mediating variable, or outcome variable. The correlates of workplace ostracism among nurses involved individual and organizational factors. Potential mechanisms included psychological resource depletion, reduced organizational identification, and impaired communication. Associated outcomes covered multiple levels, including individual psychological health, professional behavior, and organizational functioning. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that workplace ostracism is a complex and context-dependent phenomenon in nursing organizations. Given the predominance of cross-sectional designs, future research should strengthen theoretical integration and methodological development, including longitudinal studies, intervention studies, mixed-methods research, and cross-cultural comparisons, to further clarify its pathways and effective intervention strategies. Nursing managers should address leadership behaviors, team culture, communication safety, and organizational support to reduce workplace ostracism and its potential adverse consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.