Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534830›Full record

ArticleHealth equity

Perspectives from Black Midwifery Leaders on Scaling Culturally Affirming and Community-Centered Models of Care.

Noelene K Jeffers, Sylvie T Wilson, Yordanos Tesfai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noelene K JeffersJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-6690
Sylvie T WilsonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yordanos TesfaiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Black midwifery practice leaders are reimagining perinatal care for Black women and birthing people by designing and implementing innovative culturally affirming community models of care. They possess a unique lens on the factors that sustain and threaten their innovative work. The aim of this study was to explore Black midwives' perspectives on the components of these models of care, their leadership experiences, and facilitators and barriers of scaling these models for maximal impact for Black women and birthing people throughout the United States. Methods: We purposively identified and conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with Black midwifery leaders (i.e., founders, directors, owners of Black-led community-centered midwifery practices). We interviewed nine participants including certified nurse-midwives ( Results: We identified four themes: (1) Reclaiming a legacy of care and safety: the incorporation of ancestral traditions and culturally holistic practices to create responsive models of care; (2) Scaling up: the urgent need for more Black midwives and culturally safe educational and professional development pathways; (3) Scaling out: the necessary policy and infrastructure reforms, particularly reimbursement reform and regulatory integration; and (4) Scaling deep: the importance of transformative cultural norms and solidarity-based relationships. Conclusion: Black midwives lay out a vision of how their reimagining can be scaled nationally. Their suggestions span broader structural changes relevant to all midwives, while also identifying potential solutions specific to the needs of Black midwives, who face both racism and hostility toward the practice of midwifery.

Indexed as

Black womenequityinnovationmidwiferypolicyracismworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID42534830
PMCPMC13421817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.