ArticlePeerJ2026
Proteomic dynamics in endochondral ossification: insights from antler tip analysis.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The antler primary growth center, located at the distal tip of the growing antler, comprises five consecutive tissue zones beneath the velvet skin. Because the outermost reserve mesenchyme contains blastema progenitor cells with multipotent differentiation capacity, antler regeneration recapitulates embryonic skeletal development through endochondral ossification (ECO). The molecular mechanisms governing cell fate decisions and tissue morphogenesis across these zones remain poorly understood. Methods: We profiled the proteome of the sika deer ( Results: A total of 8,173 proteins were identified across the five tissue zones, representing the most comprehensive proteomic coverage of the antler growth center. Clustering analyses resolved distinct protein expression modules corresponding to sequential ECO stages from mesenchymal proliferation in the reserve mesenchyme to cartilage mineralization in the innermost zone. Deep proteome coverage enabled detection of low-abundance chondrogenic transcription factors SOX9, SOX6, and RUNX3, whose spatial expression matched their known roles in chondrogenesis. At the protein level, the reserve mesenchyme co-expressed 11 embryonic and 23 mesenchymal stem cell markers, indicating that antler stem cells represented a unique mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) population possessing partial embryonic stem cell (ESC)-like features. Conclusions: This study provides a spatially resolved proteomic atlas of the complete antler growth center and identifies key regulatory proteins at each stage of endochondral ossification. The findings offer new insights into progenitor cell characteristics, transcription factor activity, and protein dynamics during bone development, with potential relevance to bone repair and regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.