Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534813›Full record

ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2026

Environmental footprint of a soybean-supplemented low-fat vegan diet in postmenopausal women: a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial.

Ilana Fischer, Arathi Jayaraman, Brighid McKay, Laura Chiavaroli, Songhee Back, Reagan Smith, Richard Holubkov, Neal D Barnard, Hana Kahleova

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04587154 (Womens Study to Alleviate Vasomotor Symptoms), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04587154 nacompletednot on this map

Womens Study to Alleviate Vasomotor Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhysicians Committee for Responsible MedicineRan2020 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsHot FlashesArmslow-fat vegan diet with 1/2 cup soybeans daily
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilana FischerPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4401-7070
Arathi JayaramanPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-455X
Brighid McKayDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura ChiavaroliDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Songhee BackDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Reagan SmithPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Richard HolubkovSchool of Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Neal D BarnardPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Hana KahleovaPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dietary patterns that limit or avoid animal products contribute fewer greenhouse gases and require less energy than diets containing more animal products. However, quantifications of these outcomes on a vegan diet in real-life conditions still need to be explored. Methods: In a randomised controlled trial, a low-fat vegan diet supplemented with soybeans led to a significant reduction in hot flashes in postmenopausal women. In this secondary analysis of that study, we hypothesised that the intervention diet would have a reduced environmental impact, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and cumulative energy demand (CED). 3-day diet records were analysed at baseline and at the end of the 12-week study, and we linked dietary intakes to environmental footprints. Results: Compared with no change in the omnivorous control group, we found that the vegan group had a decrease in GHGEs (p <0.001) of 35% (-662.7 g CO Conclusion: Adoption of a soybean-supplemented low-fat vegan diet significantly reduced cumulative energy demand and GHGEs, important drivers of climate change. Trial registration number: NCT04587154.

Indexed as

Dietary patternsWeight management

Identifiers

PMID42534813
PMCPMC13422045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.