Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534759›Full record

ArticleHealth equity

Reimagining Perinatal Mental Health Care Models: A Community-Engaged Approach to Develop a Partner-Inclusive, In-Home Intervention.

Janelle S Peifer, Erin L P Bradley, Rachel Vanderkruik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janelle S PeiferDepartment of Psychology, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-7750
Erin L P BradleyDepartment of Public Health, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia, USA.
Rachel VanderkruikCenter for Women's Mental Health at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) are among the most common complications of pregnancy. Yet, identification, access, and intervention lag behind need, particularly for those from historically marginalized backgrounds. Although couples-based, cognitive behavioral approaches show promise, few interventions integrate community-engaged, partner-inclusive, and in-home approaches that bolster accessibility. Methodology: This article presents the development and protocol for the New Family Wellness Project (NFWP). The six-session NFWP focuses on shared family values and communication supplemented with between-session provider check-ins, support groups, homework, and tailored case management. Twenty-two participants (8 couples; 6 mothers alone) provided quantitative and qualitative feedback on the NFWP feasibility and acceptability. Results: Participants reported very high engagement (M = 96/100) and identified the in-home and partner-inclusive format as vital. Qualitative feedback highlighted that the NFWP improved communication and enhanced reflection on family values and actionable steps to support effective co-parenting. Nearly half of the participants said they would Conclusions: Preliminary findings support the feasibility and acceptability of this community-engaged, cognitive behavioral therapy, couples-based intervention for PMADs. Future directions explore scalability on a larger scale to enhance equitable, perinatal mental health interventions for family systems.

Indexed as

cognitive behavioral therapycommunity-engaged researchcouples interventionperinatal mental health

Identifiers

PMID42534759
PMCPMC13421969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.