ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Beyond visual inspection: the deep learning revolution in quantitative cerebrovascular imaging.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising global burden of cerebrovascular disease, propelled by an aging population, highlights the inherent limitations of conventional, labor-intensive diagnostic paradigms. In the context of time-sensitive stroke management, variability in image interpretation and the high rate of misclassification, particularly during the assessment of transient ischemic attack (TIA), underscore the urgent need for more consistent and efficient diagnostic solutions. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), offers a transformative pathway by automating the analysis of complex neurovascular imaging. Here, we conduct a comprehensive examination of how DL is revolutionizing stroke-related image analysis, moving beyond general assertions of potential to discuss specific technical implementations. We systematically detail the evolution from traditional segmentation algorithms to advanced deep learning architectures-such as U-Net, DeepMedic, and their variants-in performing critical tasks. These tasks encompass the automated segmentation of intracranial and extracranial (carotid) arteries, the quantification of stenosis and plaque burden, and the hemodynamic assessment of vascular lesions across modalities including MRA, CTA, and DSA. By synthesizing landmark studies, our analysis delineates three core aspects: the technological trajectory of DL models in achieving expert-level accuracy in vascular feature extraction in controlled studies; the clinical translation of these tools into diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic procedural planning workflows; and the persistent challenges and future directions, including data standardization, model generalizability, and multimodal integration. This review posits that DL represents not merely an assistive technology but a foundational cornerstone for the next generation of precision cerebrovascular medicine. It holds the potential to bridge critical gaps in diagnostic speed, objectivity, and accessibility, provided its development and validation are guided by rigorous, interdisciplinary collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.