Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534728›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Beyond visual inspection: the deep learning revolution in quantitative cerebrovascular imaging.

Xuewei Mao, Huajun Yang, Shiwen Weng, Fangyun Peng, Jiazhen Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuewei MaoSchool of Automation and the Shandong Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Huajun YangNeurological Department, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shiwen WengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fangyun PengSchool of Automation and the Shandong Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jiazhen XuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising global burden of cerebrovascular disease, propelled by an aging population, highlights the inherent limitations of conventional, labor-intensive diagnostic paradigms. In the context of time-sensitive stroke management, variability in image interpretation and the high rate of misclassification, particularly during the assessment of transient ischemic attack (TIA), underscore the urgent need for more consistent and efficient diagnostic solutions. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL), offers a transformative pathway by automating the analysis of complex neurovascular imaging. Here, we conduct a comprehensive examination of how DL is revolutionizing stroke-related image analysis, moving beyond general assertions of potential to discuss specific technical implementations. We systematically detail the evolution from traditional segmentation algorithms to advanced deep learning architectures-such as U-Net, DeepMedic, and their variants-in performing critical tasks. These tasks encompass the automated segmentation of intracranial and extracranial (carotid) arteries, the quantification of stenosis and plaque burden, and the hemodynamic assessment of vascular lesions across modalities including MRA, CTA, and DSA. By synthesizing landmark studies, our analysis delineates three core aspects: the technological trajectory of DL models in achieving expert-level accuracy in vascular feature extraction in controlled studies; the clinical translation of these tools into diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic procedural planning workflows; and the persistent challenges and future directions, including data standardization, model generalizability, and multimodal integration. This review posits that DL represents not merely an assistive technology but a foundational cornerstone for the next generation of precision cerebrovascular medicine. It holds the potential to bridge critical gaps in diagnostic speed, objectivity, and accessibility, provided its development and validation are guided by rigorous, interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

cerebrovascular imagingdeep learningimage segmentationquantitative imagingstroke diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID42534728
PMCPMC13422217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.