Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534702›Full record

ArticleHealth equity

Rethinking Weight-Centric Models: Advancing Weight-Inclusive Care for Black Women.

Ashley Sneed, Rayonna Booth, Rachel E Mason, JaNelle M Ricks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashley SneedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5538-4181
Rayonna BoothCollege of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rachel E MasonDivision of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
JaNelle M RicksCollege of Public Health, Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion,The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight-inclusive interventions offer a promising alternative to traditional weight-centric approaches that focus primarily on weight loss. Black women, who are disproportionately classified as having obesity based on body mass index (BMI) criteria, often face limited success and added stigma from weight-focused models, which overlook the complex biological, social, and structural factors affecting health, as well as intersecting oppressions like racism, sexism, and weight bias. This article examines how cultural norms, body image, and systemic barriers shape health behaviors among Black women and argues for weight-inclusive care, which prioritizes health-promoting behaviors and overall well-being rather than weight loss and better aligns with their values and lived experiences, including autonomy. Evidence from weight-inclusive interventions demonstrates improvements in psychological well-being, body appreciation, and health behaviors, though research in racially diverse populations remains limited. Culturally responsive, weight-inclusive approaches tailored to Black women are essential for supporting sustainable, meaningful health outcomes while fostering positive body image and self-perception.

Indexed as

Black womenbody imageweight-inclusive careweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID42534702
PMCPMC13420979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.