ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Neural speech encoding in fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: an exploratory study using frequency-following responses.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is associated with neurodevelopmental impairments, including listening difficulties not always explained by peripheral hearing loss, suggesting alterations at the level of neural auditory processing. The frequency-following response (FFR) provides an objective measure of neural speech encoding and may offer insight into auditory function in this population. Methods: Twenty-five normal-hearing participants were included: 11 individuals with FASD and 14 controls. Speech-evoked FFRs were recorded using a 160 ms /da/ stimulus at 80 dB SPL with a stimulation rate of 4.35/s. Pitch tracking, stimulus-response correlation, response latency, and signal quality were analyzed using non-parametric statistics. Given the exploratory nature of the study and uncontrolled demographic variables - including a significant age difference between groups - findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Results: Compared to controls, individuals with FASD showed reduced pitch-tracking consistency and lower stimulus-response correlation, with the most robust finding being a large-effect reduction in F0-range correlation (R[70-120 Hz]: Conclusion: This exploratory proof-of-concept study provides preliminary evidence of altered neural speech encoding in individuals with FASD despite normal peripheral hearing. Given uncontrolled confounds, observed differences cannot be specifically attributed to FASD. These findings establish the feasibility of FFR in this population and provide the empirical foundation for future controlled research on auditory biomarkers and intervention monitoring in FASD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.