Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534615›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2026

"Integrating Patients' Perspectives into Continuing Medical Education (CME) to Address Disparities in Gynecologic Cancer Care".

Leen Alyaseen, Sarah A Nisly, Kathryn Burn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leen AlyaseenDecera Clinical Education, Reston, VA, USA.
Sarah A NislyDecera Clinical Education, Reston, VA, USA.
Kathryn BurnSmart Patients®, San Jose, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing disparities exist in gynecologic cancer outcomes, and gaps remain in healthcare professional (HCP) education related to communication, equity, and survivorship. This retrospective mixed-methods analysis examined whether embedding patient narratives in continuing medical education (CME) for gynecologic oncology was associated with shifts in HCPs' reported intentions to change practice. Accredited CME activities delivered in the United States from 2021 to 2023 were reviewed. Provider post-activity evaluation data and de-identified patient narratives from Smart Patients®, an online community for patients and families, were included. Categorical evaluation outcomes were summarized using frequencies and percentages; differences in behavioral-change response categories across years were assessed using chi-square tests of independence; and patient narrative themes were compared descriptively with HCP-reported intent-to-change categories. The analysis included 4,057 unique learners in 2021, 16,970 in 2022, and 10,278 in 2023, alongside 171 patient narratives. The proportion of HCPs planning to implement changes remained stable across years (44-49%; χ² = 7.81, df = 4,

Indexed as

communicationcontinuing medical educationGynaecologic cancergynaecologic oncologyhealth equitypatient narrativessurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID42534615
PMCPMC13421798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.