ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Surgical Management of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Reconstruction of the Oral Defect Using a Lingual Island Flap: Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Management of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Reconstruction of the Oral Defect Using a Lingual Island Flap: Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignant neoplasm of the oral cavity and requires surgical resection with adequate oncologic margins and functional reconstruction of the resulting defect. We report the case of a 78-year-old male patient with locally recurrent well-differentiated OSCC who was treated with surgical resection with 10 mm safety margins, reconstruction with an island tongue flap, and selective bilateral Level IA neck dissection. Although microvascular free flaps represent the reconstructive gold standard for extensive defects and the submental flap is a reliable regional alternative, the island tongue flap was selected because of the posterior location of the defect, the moderate size of the resection, and the availability of adjacent tissue with similar characteristics, allowing adequate intraoral coverage with lower surgical morbidity. One of its main disadvantages is the need for a second procedure to divide the pedicle. Postoperative follow-up demonstrated satisfactory intraoral healing, with no evidence of flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, or scar contracture. Adequate tongue mobility, including protrusion, elevation, and lateralization, was observed, with satisfactory preservation of speech, swallowing, and mouth opening. At the 14 months of follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, with preserved oral function and no clinical evidence of local recurrence. This case demonstrates that the island tongue flap remains an effective and functional reconstructive option for selected posterior intraoral defects, providing favorable medium-term outcomes, preservation of oral function, and minimal morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.