Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534603›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Intersectional approaches to cognitive aging: a practical guide to modeling heterogeneous trajectories with GLMM-trees.

Jeongwon Choi, Belinda Homer, Sunmee Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeongwon ChoiDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Belinda HomerDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Sunmee KimDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding cognitive aging through an intersectional lens requires analytical methods that can flexibly identify subgroup-specific trajectories across multiple social identities. However, traditional longitudinal models often require researchers to specify how these identities interact in advance, limiting their ability to uncover unexpected patterns of heterogeneity. This article presents a step-by-step guide to applying Generalized Linear Mixed Model Trees (GLMM-trees)-a flexible, recursive partitioning method that integrates mixed-effects modeling with decision-tree algorithms-to uncover distinct cognitive aging patterns shaped by intersecting sociodemographic factors. We demonstrate the utility of this method using data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), with cognitive outcomes measured across five waves. The protocol outlines materials, analytic steps, visualization tools, and strategies to avoid overfitting. We illustrate how GLMM-trees can detect previously unobserved subgroups defined by combinations of education, race, gender, and income that differentially influence both baseline cognitive performance and change over time. By enabling data-driven detection of heterogeneity, GLMM-trees offer a powerful tool for researchers seeking to apply intersectional frameworks to aging research and other domains involving complex longitudinal data.

Indexed as

cognitive aginggeneralized linear mixed model trees (GLMM-trees)health and retirement study (HRS)intersectionalitylongitudinal analysisrecursive partitioningsocial determinants of healthsubgroup detection

Identifiers

PMID42534603
PMCPMC13421182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.