ArticleJournal of family & reproductive health2026
Staphylococcus Aureus Toxic Shock Syndrome With Urinary Tract Infection.
Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a rare case of non-menstrual staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome (TSS) with Staphylococcus aureus urinary tract infection as the suspected primary source and to highlight the successful use of linezolid as adjunctive therapy when clindamycin resistance is present. Case report: A 42-year-old woman presented with fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and severe vulvar pain. One month prior, she experienced vaginal pruritus with excoriations and fissuring that never fully resolved. On examination, she had conjunctival injection, tongue inflammation with non-vesicular lesions, and a diffuse erythematous macular rash. Laboratory evaluation revealed elevated transaminases, thrombocytopenia, and bandemia. Urinalysis demonstrated 100,000 CFU of Staphylococcus aureus. Gynecologic examination revealed vulvar and vaginal erythema with ulcerated cervical lesions. Vaginal culture also grew heavy Staphylococcus aureus. Given the constellation of fever, rash, mucosal involvement, hepatic dysfunction, and positive Staphylococcus aureus cultures, a diagnosis of toxic shock syndrome was made. The isolate was resistant to clindamycin, necessitating treatment with vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and linezolid. The patient improved and completed 14 days of antibiotic therapy with complete resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: Staphylococcus aureus urinary tract infection is an exceedingly rare source of toxic shock syndrome. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for TSS in patients with any staphylococcal infection presenting with fever and multisystem involvement. Linezolid is an effective alternative to clindamycin for toxin suppression, particularly in cases involving clindamycin-resistant organisms. Prior mucosal barrier disruption may be an important risk factor for TSS development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.