Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534547›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Mapping relational mechanism clusters in

Zhengting Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhengting ZhaoGraduate Institute of Interpretation and Translation, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Some psychological patterns appear as events; others become visible only as sequences. Literary fiction is unusually rich in such sequences, because it records how attachment, injury, dependence, and release accumulate across time. This study asks whether the language of one novel-W. Somerset Maugham's Methods: We wrote short "anchor" texts for eight relational or existential constructs and two negative-control domains, then measured, in embedding space, how closely each chapter and scene matched each anchor. At chapter level (122 chapters), we tested whether construct signals peak at the same chapters, whether the Mildred Arc differs from the Resolution segment, and whether neighbouring chapters resemble one another. At scene level (165 scenes from Chapters 55-122), we identified which scenes drive chapter peaks. Three embedding models tested robustness; six independent readers rated 20 scenes for external validation. Results: The construct signals clustered at the same chapters far more than chance permutations allow. In the late novel, four constructs-a narcissistic relational style, coercive control, intermittent reinforcement, and trauma bonding-were higher in the Mildred Arc than in the Resolution segment, while other constructs were not. Scene analysis showed that each chapter peak came from a few distinct local scenes rather than from uniform elevation. The negative controls did not follow the toxic-relational pattern; they peaked instead in reasoning-heavy and travel passages. The pattern held across all three models; the largest model did not give the cleanest separation. Human ratings of key scenes converged with the model on the core constructs (mean Spearman Discussion: Without diagnosing fictional characters, the study shows how theory-guided anchors can map where a novel organizes interpersonal mechanisms, combining chapter-level trajectories, scene-level localization, negative-control anchors, cross-model checks, and human-rater validation. The workflow is portable to other long-form literary texts.

Indexed as

coercive controlliterary narrativemultiscale analysisOf Human Bondagerelational dynamicstext embedding analysistheory-driven construct measurementtrauma bonding

Identifiers

PMID42534547
PMCPMC13420877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.