Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534511›Full record

ArticleHealth equity

Challenging Racism in Perinatal Care: How Doulas Advocate for Black Women.

Juan L Salinas, Thalia Diaz, Manisha Salinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juan L SalinasUniversity of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-4074
Thalia DiazUniversity of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Manisha SalinasMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic racism continues to shape maternal health care in the United States, contributing to higher rates of adverse outcomes for Black women and other women of color. Doulas have emerged as important advocates, yet little is known about how doulas' own racial identities influence their work in challenging inequities. Methods: This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to explore doulas' perspectives on racism in maternal health care. Ten doulas in Northeast Florida participated in in-depth interviews and focus groups between 2021 and 2022. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using established qualitative methods. Results: Four major themes were identified: (1) challenging differential racial treatment, (2) leveraging privilege, (3) anti-racist doula training, and (4) advocating for Black doula recruitment and engagement. White doulas described using their privilege to support clients of color, while Black doulas described navigating heightened scrutiny and exclusion. Across participants, there was consensus that current training inadequately prepares doulas to address racism and that greater racial diversity within the profession is essential. Discussion: Findings highlight how doulas both confront and adapt to systemic racism in maternal health care. Their accounts point to gaps in training and structural barriers to equitable practice, while also illustrating how advocacy can both protect clients and, at times, reproduce inequities through unequal access to power and privilege. Health Equity Implications: Addressing how race and privilege shape advocacy pathways, reforming training to include racial justice, expanding recruitment and support for Black doulas, and integrating doulas into perinatal care models are important strategies for advancing maternal health equity and advocating for Black racial justice in health.

Indexed as

doulasmaternal health caresystemic racism

Identifiers

PMID42534511
PMCPMC13420973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.