ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Exploring pharmaceutical waste management in Southern Africa: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring pharmaceutical waste management in Southern Africa: a scoping review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical waste management is an emerging health and environmental concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries with limited waste infrastructure. This scoping review examined pharmaceutical waste practices and policies in Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia and South Africa at the healthcare facility and household levels. We systematically searched databases and grey literature sources from 2004 to 2024. Out of 729 research studies and 129 reports identified, we included 28 publications. The results were synthesised to show segregation, treatment and disposal practices. Regulatory frameworks existed in most countries, but often lacked detailed guidance and effective enforcement. Definitions of pharmaceutical waste varied, and documentation practices were inconsistent. Inappropriate practices of pharmaceutical waste management, such as inadequate incineration and landfilling conditions, were frequently reported. These findings are concerning and indicate a need for clearer, context-appropriate policies, stronger implementation mechanisms, improved segregation systems and further research, particularly at the household level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.