ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2026
Implementing evidence-based care for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder in public mental health services: clinician perspectives of barriers and enablers.
Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a model of care for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), by outlining the barriers and enablers experienced by clinicians implementing the model in routine public health settings. Method: Six child and adolescent public mental health services participated in a Type 2 implementation and effectiveness trial of an OCD model of care. Clinicians were trained in screening, assessment, psychoeducation and group-based exposure with response prevention. Focus group interviews were conducted at the conclusion of the trial with clinicians from each service. Interview responses were guided by a logic model to elucidate enablers and barriers to implementation, considering resources, moderators, mediators and outcomes. Results: Implementation varied across services. Three key themes emerged. Firstly, existing resources were directly and inversely linked to implementation. Secondly, OCD training and specialised clinical support increased clinicians' knowledge and skills, benefitting both clinicians and clients. Finally, case complexity influenced how and when implementation occurred. Conclusions: The model of care was feasible and acceptable. Adjuncts to clinical service delivery (e.g. attending training) were easier to implement than changes to existing procedures (e.g. introducing screening). Aligned with the UK NICE guidelines, this model of care may be suitable for public Australian services to improve OCD detection and treatment for young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.