Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534486›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2026

Implementing evidence-based care for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder in public mental health services: clinician perspectives of barriers and enablers.

K M Dyason, S Wilson, P Pham, L J Farrell, J R Grisham, N Taylor, B Tapp, T Dyson, B Richmond, T Bustos and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

K M DyasonDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4854-3314
S WilsonDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
P PhamDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia.
L J FarrellGriffith Centre for Mental Health and School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-2227
J R GrishamSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-1744
N TaylorImplementation to Impact (i2i), School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0280-0883
B TappChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South-Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
T DysonChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South-Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
B RichmondSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-7438
T BustosChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South-Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.
K KnightDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, Australia.
C GaskinChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South-Eastern Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2243-7577
I E PerkesDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-9032

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a model of care for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), by outlining the barriers and enablers experienced by clinicians implementing the model in routine public health settings. Method: Six child and adolescent public mental health services participated in a Type 2 implementation and effectiveness trial of an OCD model of care. Clinicians were trained in screening, assessment, psychoeducation and group-based exposure with response prevention. Focus group interviews were conducted at the conclusion of the trial with clinicians from each service. Interview responses were guided by a logic model to elucidate enablers and barriers to implementation, considering resources, moderators, mediators and outcomes. Results: Implementation varied across services. Three key themes emerged. Firstly, existing resources were directly and inversely linked to implementation. Secondly, OCD training and specialised clinical support increased clinicians' knowledge and skills, benefitting both clinicians and clients. Finally, case complexity influenced how and when implementation occurred. Conclusions: The model of care was feasible and acceptable. Adjuncts to clinical service delivery (e.g. attending training) were easier to implement than changes to existing procedures (e.g. introducing screening). Aligned with the UK NICE guidelines, this model of care may be suitable for public Australian services to improve OCD detection and treatment for young people.

Indexed as

childchild and adolescent mental health servicesimplementationObsessive-compulsive disorderpublic healthtype 2 trial

Identifiers

PMID42534486
PMCPMC13421133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.