ArticleHealth equity
Gender Diversity Among U.S. Allopathic Medical School Graduates, 2016-2023.
Article in Health equity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to characterize demographic characteristics of transgender and nonbinary (trans) medical students and their training experiences. Methods: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of responses to the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (2016-2023) to characterize trans medical students using measures of race, ethnicity, age, and medical school region; assess overall satisfaction with medical training; and evaluate time to graduation, all compared to cisgender peers. Results: Among 121,291 respondents who completed gender identity items, 837 (0.7%) were trans. After adjustment, trans graduates were more likely to be unsatisfied with their education (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08, 3.29, Conclusion: With higher odds of being unsatisfied with their education, additional research must identify and develop interventions to improve their training experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.