ArticleOTO open
Demographic Differences in Otolaryngology Applicants Compared with Other Specialties: Analysis of 2022-2024 Match Data.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed publicly available data from the National Resident Matching Program to compare the demographics of applicants who ranked otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) programs first with those who ranked other specialties first in the 2022 to 2024 Match cycles. Among 1337 applicants preferring OHNS and 110,677 applicants preferring non-OHNS specialties, significant differences emerged. OHNS applicants were more likely to be male, White, and US citizens, and less likely to identify as Asian, Black/African American, or Hispanic/Latino. They were also less likely to report indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage, including first-generation college or medical graduate status, or receipt of government assistance during childhood. No significant differences were observed in sexual orientation or disability status. These findings suggest that applicants to OHNS differ demographically from those to other specialties, with evidence of underrepresentation of individuals from historically marginalized and lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Similar trends have been observed in other competitive specialties, underscoring the need for targeted efforts to improve equity in recruitment strategies. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.