Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534409›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2026

Challenges and possible solutions towards reaching global cervical cancer elimination.

Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr, Joakim Dillner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laila Sara Arroyo MührCenter for Cervical Cancer Elimination, F56, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 14186, Sweden.
Joakim DillnerCenter for Cervical Cancer Elimination, F56, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, 14186, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women, despite being largely preventable through Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, HPV screening, and treatment. The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for global elimination of cervical cancer. While progress has been made in the worldwide implementation of preventive measures, the global uptake (particularly of HPV-based screening) lags behind. However, a major advance is the increased supply of HPV vaccines, propelled partly by the shift to one-dose vaccine schedules, which presents new opportunities for faster cervical cancer elimination using expanded HPV vaccination strategies such as gender-neutral vaccination, catch-up vaccination, and concomitant vaccination and screening. Another major advance is the WHO target product profile that specifies that only the 8 most important types of HPV must be screened for, which greatly improves the specificity and feasibility of HPV-based screening. This article outlines the key challenges, highlights successful examples of innovative strategies, and proposes evidence-based next steps, including specific actions on global prioritization, real-time monitoring, innovation, and equity-driven action.

Indexed as

Cancer eliminationCervical cancerGender neutralHPV vaccinationHuman papillomavirusScreening

Identifiers

PMID42534409
PMCPMC13420604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.