ArticleHealth science reports2026
Identifying the Most Important Influencing Factors Based on Demographic Information, Nutrition, Physical Activity, Leisure Time, and Underlying Diseases in the Severity of Disease in COVID-19 Patients Using Data Mining Techniques.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions of individuals worldwide and resulted in substantial mortality. Data mining and machine learning techniques enable the analysis of comprehensive patient data, facilitating the identification of key patterns and determinants that support clinical and preventive decision-making. Methods: This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning approaches-Deep Learning, Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-in identifying factors associated with COVID-19 severity. A comparative analysis based on ROC curves and quantitative performance metrics demonstrates that Deep Learning and GBDT outperform SVM. Results: All models consistently identify hypertension as a major risk factor. However, differences emerge in other influential variables: GBDT ranks hypertension as the most significant factor, followed by stomach ulcers, whereas Deep Learning highlights vitamin intake as the primary determinant. The deep learning tree variant further supports the importance of vitamin consumption. Conclusion: The superior predictive performance of Deep Learning and GBDT provides a reliable benchmark and yields novel insights, including the potential roles of stomach ulcers and vitamin intake in disease severity. These findings emphasize the value of employing multiple high-performing models and robust validation strategies for accurate identification of clinical risk factors in COVID-19.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.