ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
Statistical modeling of days alive out-of-hospital: An illustration using the SSU trial.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Days alive out-of-hospital (DAOOH) is a well-accepted outcome in clinical research, as it summarizes both hospitalization and mortality. However, its distribution is often skewed, making accurate modeling challenging in practice. We utilized data from a randomized trial to discuss estimands and statistical methods of interest for DAOOH. Methods: We examined several estimands and statistical models targeting these estimands, including linear regression, gamma regression, ordinal regression, and the probabilistic index model. Comparison was based on interpretability, precision, and model fit. We adopted G-computation to assess causal effects leveraging different regression models to target a simple unified estimand. Results: For unadjusted analyses, the Mann-Whitney Conclusions: Our findings illustrate trade-offs of estimands and model choices for DAOOH, providing guidance for method selection. Based on data from this randomized trial, the Mann-Whitney
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.