ArticleJAACAP open2026
Social Disparity and Treatment-Seeking in Eating Disorders During Childhood and Adolescence: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in JAACAP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Advantaged socioeconomic circumstances are linked to a higher risk of diagnosed eating disorders (EDs). However, evidence on non-diagnosed cases, that is, individuals reporting ED symptoms without formal diagnosis, remains limited, suggesting detection and treatment-seeking barriers. In this study, we assessed associations between socioeconomic circumstances and clinically diagnosed and non-diagnosed EDs in childhood and adolescence. Method: This study used data from the Danish National Birth Cohort, linking registry-based diagnosed EDs (participant ages 6-18 years) with self-reported ED symptoms at age 18 years. Data included 523,148 individuals born in Denmark between 1996 and 2003, with 44,552 providing information on self-reported ED symptoms used to classify non-diagnosed EDs. Socioeconomic indicators, including parental education and household income at age 6 years, were analyzed using quasi-Poisson and multinomial logistic regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and relative risk ratios (RRRs). Results: Diagnosed EDs were more common among individuals with higher parental education, following a stepwise pattern. Compared to short education (∼12 years), long education (∼17-20 years) was associated with higher risk (IRR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21-1.52), whereas basic education (∼10 years) was linked to lower risk (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.83). The pattern reversed for non-diagnosed EDs, with individuals whose parents had basic education showing a higher risk (RRR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.83-2.63) compared to individuals whose parents had short education. No clear pattern was observed for household income. Conclusion: This study highlights socioeconomic disparities in ED diagnosis and treatment. Individuals from educationally advantaged backgrounds were more likely to receive a diagnosis, whereas those from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds had a higher risk of non-diagnosed EDs. Study registration information: Parental Social Disparity and Adolescent Eating Disorders; https://osf.io/dm24e/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.