ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
The sponsor-proxy model: Bridging basic science discovery and investigator-initiated clinical trials.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Translating academic discoveries into clinical investigation remains a major barrier in translational science, particularly when investigators lack the regulatory infrastructure required to sponsor clinical trials. These challenges are especially pronounced for natural product therapeutics, which often lack commercial sponsorship despite promising preclinical evidence. The Penn State Cancer Institute established an Investigator-Initiated Trial Sponsor Support Unit (SSU) to facilitate investigator-initiated trials and support progression toward National Cancer Institute designation. We describe a translational science case study of a Sponsor-Proxy operational model in which a centralized institutional unit performs sponsor-level regulatory and trial infrastructure functions while investigators retain scientific and clinical leadership. Two National Institutes of Health-funded trials evaluating Angelica gigas Nakai extract (INM176) illustrate this framework. The SSU authored regulatory documentation including Investigator's Brochures, coordinated Investigational New Drug submissions, and supported trial infrastructure while clinical teams maintained participant oversight. Both trials achieved activation timelines of 112 and 105 days, shorter than previously reported activation times and within National Cancer Institute operational benchmarks. Sponsor-level oversight continued throughout trial conduct, including regulatory reporting, safety monitoring, and protocol amendment support. This case study demonstrates how centralized institutional expertise can overcome sponsor-level barriers and enable translation of basic science discoveries into investigator-initiated early-phase clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.