ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is one of the most common cardiomyopathy phenotypes. Moreover, sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a leading cause of mortality in patients with DCM, predominantly driven by malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Current guideline-recommended risk stratification relies heavily on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to guide implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy; however, attention has recently shifted toward a multiparametric strategy that integrates clinical characteristics with electrocardiographic markers, biomarkers, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings, genetic testing, and electrophysiological studies. This review summarizes current evidence on established and emerging tools for SCD risk stratification in DCM, highlights the limitations of single-parameter approaches, and discusses future directions toward more personalized, dynamic risk assessment to optimize SCD outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.