ArticleCardiology research and practice2026
Advancing the Achieve Catheter in Different Branches of Pulmonary Vein as a Routine Approach During Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing the Achieve Catheter in Different Branches of Pulmonary Vein as a Routine Approach During Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated high procedural success rate and promising clinical outcome. How to expand the antrum ablation area and get better results is a challenging topic for patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Methods and Results: We enrolled 709 patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent initial PVI with a second-generation CB between January 2020 and August 2022, including 293 CBA applications in different branches of each PV and 416 in the same branch of each PV. The orientation difference in the transverse plane was negatively correlated with the ostium-bifurcation distance. In the different-branch CBA group, after the first application in one branch, PV potentials could still be recorded in the other branch in 39 of the 293 patients (13.3%) and the PV foci could trigger AF in 7 of them. In a consecutive 30 patients by using 3D mapping system, the total antral surface lesions after the application in a second branch were larger than those after the first application ( Conclusion: CBA applications performed in different branches of each PV could create wide isolated antral surface areas and eliminate PV foci adequately. CBA in different branches of PVs with long ostium-bifurcation distances had less significance. The recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmia was statistically lower in the different-branch CBA group compared with that in the same-branch CBA group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.