Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42534314›Full record

ArticleAmerican economic journal. Economic policy2017

Technological Change and Risk Adjustment: Benefit Design Incentives in Medicare Part D.

Colleen Carey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American economic journal. Economic policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk adjustment for regional healthcare funding allocations with ensemble methods: an empirical study and interpretation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets.The review of economics and statistics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Incorporating self-reported health measures in risk equalization through constrained regression.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  11. Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment.The journal of political economy · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Strategic Formulary Design in Medicare Part D Plans.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Selection in Health Insurance Markets and Its Policy Remedies.The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Colleen CareyDepartment of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, Martha van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R36 HS020881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subsidized health insurance markets use diagnosis-based risk adjustment to induce insurers to offer an equitable benefit to individuals of varying expected cost. I demonstrate that technological change after risk adjustment calibration-new drug entry and the onset of generic competition-made certain diagnoses profitable or unprofitable in Medicare Part D. I then exploit variation in diagnoses' profitability driven by technological change to show insurers designed more favorable benefits for drugs that treat profitable diagnoses as compared to unprofitable diagnoses. In the presence of technological change, risk adjustment may not fully neutralize insurers' incentives to select through benefit designs.

Indexed as

G22H51I13I18L65O33

Identifiers

PMID42534314
PMCPMC13420002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.